BJP demands inquiry on killing of youth at
former CM’s residence
Jammu, Aug 09: Stressing that the political relationship of J&K with the
rest of India is set through “Instrument of Accession” only, BJP tells that
Constitutionally and legally, nothing can save 35-A.
This was stated in a Press Conference held at
party headquarter by BJP Chief State Spokesperson Sunil Sethi along with BJP
State Press Secretary & State Media Incharge Dr. Pardeep Mahotra. Where as
he also raises certain questions on the killing of youth at former CM’s
residence.
Sunil Sethi attacked on deliberate mis campaign
by disproportionally extra vocal entities. NC’s allegation that the relation of
state with rest of India will be bothered, if 35-A ceases to exist and similar
statements being issued by PDP and other Kashmir based fringe groups like those
of Hurriyat Conference are blatant lie.
Sethi stressed that only “Instrument of
Accession” defines political relationship of the state with Nation. Article 1
very clearly defines that J&K is just like any other state of India.
Section 3 defines it as an integral part of India. J&K is an integral part
of Nation and 35-A or 370 doesn’t define relationship of state with Nation,
Sethi said.
Sethi said that in 1953, government of former
CM Sheikh Abdullah rather promised the people displaced from western Pakistan
that they will be given rights and were immediately provided lands so that they
don’t leave the state. This issue was raised in 1954 as the result of political
and diplomatic failure of former Prime Minister Pt. Nehru. In the aftermath of
those blunders, Presidential order was issued without consent from Parliament
of India, he said.
Constitutionally and legally, nothing can save
35-A, Sethi said. Supreme Court will conduct an impartial hearing and the
result will be out. Kashmiri politicians understand this fact and so are
ill-motivating people.
Sethi demanded an impartial probe be done by SIT
headed by senior IPS officer for the unwanted firing incident at the residence
of former Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah, in which a young man died. The FIR of
the family should be entered. An unarmed person with no crime history enters
the house of former CM, why? If he had intensions to harm somebody, he could
have some arms with him. How he entered the house? How he could shatter the things
inside with presence of so much security. Why the forces didn’t only fire at
the feet or legs? Why there was no CCTv Camera on the back door? Responsibility
should be fixed and the questions need to be entered, he said and added that
BJP asks for a fair enquiry into the matter.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours